The potential pitfalls in project design are long on
activity, short on learning outcomes, technology layered over traditional
practice, trivial thematic units, and overly scripted with many, many steps. If
the projects is busy and long but reaches small or lower-order learning aims,
it’s not worth investing your time or your students’ time. If learning aims are
lofty and technology helps your students reach them, then the integration of
technology is essential to the project. Thematic teaching is not necessarily
project-based learning, but when examining thematic projects or creating your
own, look for ways a theme elevates and connects the learning. As teachers, we
need to be wary of over-prescriptive project plans that have many discrete
steps.
The
best projects share important features. These features are loosely designed
with the possibility of different learning paths, generative, causing students
to construct meaning, center on a driving question or are otherwise structured
for inquiry, and capture student interest through complex and compelling real-life
or simulated experiences. Good projects also are realistic, and therefor cross
multiple disciplines, reach beyond school to involve others, tap rich data or
primary sources, are structured so students learn with and from each other, and
have students working as inquiring experts might. They also get at 21st-century
skills and literacy, including communication, project management, and
technology use, get at important learning dispositions, including persistence,
risk-taking, confidence, resilience, self-reflection, and cooperation, and have
students learn by doing.
Project
ideas come from everywhere. Some examples are a tried-and-true project with
potential for more meaningful, expressive learning, project plans developed by
and for other teachers, news stories, contemporary issues, student questions or
interests, a classroom irritant put to educational use, or even a “mashup” of a
great idea and a new tool. There are other ways where teachers can find project
ideas.
As
teachers we must remember that our project exists within a context. We need to
keep in mind as we plan the school calendar, curriculum sequence, student
readiness, and student interest. To design a project we need to revisit the
framework. We need to make a final list of learning objectives for core
subjects and allied disciplines. We also need to decide on the specific 21st-century
skills we want to address. Then we identify learning dispositions we want to
foster. Next we establish evidence of understanding. We need to imagine what
students would know or be able to do once they have learned as well as how they
would be different as learners and as people. After this we plan the project
theme or challenge. We should strive for enough structure and enough
flexibility to serve the needs of the project, and true-to-life connections.
Lastly we plan entrée into the project experience. What are the first things
you might say to get students’ attention and build excitement for the learning
ahead?
Concepts
in this chapter relate to our project because as teachers creating a project,
we need to be wary of the downsides in project designs so we don’t make the
projects a waste of the students’ time as well as our own. This chapter helps
me as a teacher know some of the qualities that the best projects share so as a
teacher I can find or create projects that help the students’ knowledge grow.
I agree with if a project is busy and long, leaarning will be low-order. The students wont get anything from the project and this will be a waste of time. This is probably the biggest "pitfall" you could have. It's very important as a teacher to be wary of the downsides to any project design, so it isn't a waste of time for you and the student.
ReplyDeleteI really like your point of view in your paper. Seeing your opinions and thoughts were very interesting. I like how you mentioned how this project is reading is relating to our project. I also like your positive attitudes towards this learning method.
ReplyDelete